Tokyo, January 20, 1996 Dear Sir: I have just received this clipping from your paper and that is why I am urgently writing you now and trust you will publish this letter or check with me if you choose to run an abbreviated version: ... I was quoted, but not fully, giving readers the opposite meaning, in the article you shortened from The Washington Post on your front page (December 21), "Seoul, Jittery, Sees a Menace in North" by Kevin Sullivan. I launched an Internet campaign to help the 500,000 flood victims in North Korea threatened by famine (http://shrine.cyber.ad.jp/mrosin/flood). I visited three of the damaged areas in November and donated relief goods directly to the victims. I am continuing my campaign focused on donating rice, this time, to the same people now facing famine, on my next trip in February. Your deletion, however, of an essential paragraph of the quote which appeared in the original article in the Washington Post has given the impression that I disputed the accurate reports of the The International Red Cross and the World Food Program experts which describe the serious food shortage and imminent famine there. My own views confirm this in the complete quote. Potential donors to my campaign, particularly in Europe, where the Trib is widely circulated, who have seen my appeal on the Internet have written me that they see no need to contribute since I myself was quoted in your paper as saying the people are well fed. This is not the case. In the complete quote I added many of the villages I visited only had a very short supply of rice left and by now could be without food. I trust, both in the interest of accuracy, and to prevent the starving population from not receiving aid from people who may have been misled, that you publish the complete text of my quote below: > At least one report out of Pyongyang paints a much less > bleak picture of the food supply than a report released this week by > the United Nations. While the serious damage inflicted by last > summer's floods is indisputable, one person who recently toured the > worst-hit areas said they are recovering quickly. > "I did not see any hunger or malnutrition when I was there," > said Bernard Krisher, an American who lives in Tokyo and spent two > weeks in North Korea in late November delivering $25,000 worth of > relief supplies he raised through an appeal on the Internet. > Krisher said that in the worst-hit areas, including Sinuiju > on the Chinese border, people still had food, electricity and > heating fuel and were in good spirits. He said most people who had > been living in schools or other temporary shelters since the floods > have moved back into their rebuilt homes. Nearly all the homes he > saw had a single overhead light bulb and a black-and-white > television set, he said. > The daily ration of rice had been cut since the floods from > 36 ounces to about 17 ounces, about two big cupped handfuls, he > said. While that is a small allotment, it is only slightly less than > the 18 ounces that the United Nations considers the minimum daily > adult requirement. > Although Krisher said he saw nothing immediately dire, he > added that food stocks are limited. In some places, he said, there > was only enough rice in warehouses to last a month. Without > continued foreign aid, the situation could become much more > desperate, he said. The final two paragraphs (which you omitted) is key to what I told Mr. Sullivan and he faithfully quoted it in his story which appeared in the Washington and other U.S. newspapers. Your copy editor, however, chose to cut this essential portion and thus distorted my observation. I hope you will run the entire quote in order to set the situation right. I welcome further donations from the public to increase the amount of rice I plan to order by February 15 to be shipped to Nampo port, consigned to me, where I will fetch it and truck it directly to villages for personal distribution which the North Korean government has already approved, as in November. This assures that no food brought in by me will be diverted to other purposes. One metric ton of rice costs $250 which will feed 75 persons for one month. Sincerely yours, Bernard Krisher
[ Back to Letters ] [ Send Email ] [ Return to Homepage ]